Experts Corner: Michigan Brownfield Incentives Keep Getting Better

A recently signed group of Senate bills promises developers in Michigan more latitude in obtaining Brownfield funding.  Key provisions of SB 908-913 expand the types of activities that can be covered, loosen requirements on applying for funding and shorten the processing time on Brownfield Plan requests under $1 million.

UST Inclusion

Before SB 908-913, Brownfield funds for activities related to Underground Storage Tank (UST) removal were limited to “Orphan” USTs, or those that were previously unknown and/or recorded. 

In a state with over 17,000 Underground Storage Tanks (USTs)* – making the top 10 in the US- the presence of buried tanks is a real concern when evaluating property to redevelop. Gas stations are usually located in central, high-traffic locations. With the expansion of “eligible activities”, the removal or closure of these tanks is now covered and opens new opportunities to redevelop and these properties.  Many developers may have previously walked away from these desirable sites due to the costs associated with removal of the USTs. 

BEA Considerations

Another positive change allows parties that acquired property that was contaminated and did not complete a BEA -whether due to timing restrictions on a transaction or limited knowledge of the process and not engaging an environmental firm soon enough etc. – to apply for Brownfield funding.  With SB 908-913, as long as you were not responsible for the contamination, you no longer need a BEA to apply for funding. However, you will still be responsible for completing your environmental due diligence during the application process.

Shorter Approval Time

Finally, a month has been shaved off Brownfield Plan approvals through the Michigan Strategic Fund (MSF), now that SB 908-913 reduced the processing time from 90 to 60 days.  Additionally, the MSF board approval is now only necessary for projects requesting more than $1 million in eligible activities (previously the limit was $500,000). MSF board approvals typically added six weeks to a project. Overall, developers of projects requesting under $1 million cut two and a half months off their approval time. 

These changes bring more efficient brownfield redevelopment tax increment financing (TIF), grant, and loan processing and encourage developers to consider a wider range of properties.

Publication Details
Date

January 26, 2017

Tags

Related Services

Empowering Communities: A Guide to EPA’s Brownfields Assessment Grants

Brownfields Grants, administered by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), are intended to empower communities to reclaim and revitalize sites that are hindered by contamination, or have the perception of contamination, and play a pivotal role in community rejuvenation. Assessment Grants serve as a crucial financial resource to support a wide array of activities focused on…

A Day in the Life of Steve Price

PM Environmental’s Principal and Vice President sits down with us to provide a glimpse into his role, as well as share some advice for ethical behavior. Q: Name, Title, Location:  Steve Price, Principal and Vice President, Lansing, Michigan. Q: Tell us a little about your role and what you do. My role is pretty unique…

Phase 1 vs. Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessments

Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs) are crucial for anyone involved in acquiring, financing, or refinancing commercial properties. Understanding the nuances of Phase I and Phase II ESAs is imperative for lenders, buyers, and potential property owners to make informed decisions and mitigate risks associated with environmental contamination. Key Takeaways Phase I ESAs are a preliminary, non-intrusive…